The gentleman insists that the states have no right to decide whether the constitution has been violated by acts of Congress or not,but that the federal government is the exclusive judge of the extent of its own powers; and that in case of a violation of the constitution, however deliberate, palpable and dangerous, a state has no constitutional redress, except where the matter can be brought before the Supreme Court, whose decision must be final and conclusive on the subject. . . What idea was espoused with the Webster-Hayne debates? It is not the creature of state Legislatures; nay, more, if the whole truth must be told, the people brought it into existence, established it, and have hitherto supported it, for the very purpose, amongst others, of imposing certain salutary restraints on state sovereignties. . . He served as a U.S. senator from 1823 to 1832, and was a leading proponent of the states' rights doctrine. Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions | Overview, Impact & Significance, Public Speaking for Teachers: Professional Development, AEPA Earth Science (AZ045): Practice & Study Guide, ORELA Early Childhood Education: Practice & Study Guide, Praxis Middle School English Language Arts (5047) Prep, MTLE Physical Education: Practice & Study Guide, ILTS Mathematics (208): Test Practice and Study Guide, MTLE Earth & Space Science: Practice & Study Guide, AEPA Business Education (NT309): Help & Review, Counselor Preparation Comprehensive Examination (CPCE): Exam Prep & Study Guide, GACE Special Education Adapted Curriculum Test I (083) Prep, GACE Special Education Adapted Curriculum Test II (084) Prep, Create an account to start this course today. The gentleman takes alarm at the sound. This important consideration, seriously and deeply impressed on our minds, led each state in the Convention to be less rigid, on points of inferior magnitude, than might have been otherwise expected.. But still, throughout American history, several debates have captured the nation's attention in a way that would make even Hollywood jealous. Webster realized that if the social, political, and economic elite of Massachusetts and the Northeast were to once again lay claim to national leadership, he had to justify New England's previous history of sectionalism within a framework of nationalistic progression. But, according to the gentlemans reading, the object of the Constitution was to consolidate the government, and the means would seem to be, the promotion of injustice, causing domestic discord, and depriving the states and the people of the blessings of liberty forever. Record of the Organization and Proceedings of The Massachusetts Lawmakers Investigate Working Condit State (Colonial) Legislatures>Massachusetts State Legislature. All of these ideas, however, are only parts of the main point. By means of missionaries and political tracts, the scheme was in a great measure successful. As sovereign states, each state could individually interpret the Constitution and even leave the Union altogether. This leads us to inquire into the origin of this government, and the source of its power. It is to state, and to defend, what I conceive to be the true principles of the Constitution under which we are here assembled. On that system, Carolina has no more interest in a canal in Ohio than in Mexico. Webster pursued his objective through a rhetorical strategy that ignored Benton, the principal opponent of New England sectionalism, and that provoked Hayne into an exposition and defense of what became the South Carolina doctrine of nullification. Since as Vice President and President of the Senate, Calhoun could not take place in the debate, Hayne represented the pro-nullification point-of-view. We found that we had to deal with a people whose physical, moral, and intellectual habits and character, totally disqualified them from the enjoyment of the blessings of freedom. It was motivated by a dispute over the continued sale of western lands, an important source of revenue for the federal government. It is only regarded as a possible means of good; or on the other hand, as a possible means of evil. Most are forgettable, to put it charitably. . The debate was important because it laid out the arguments in favor of nationalism in the face of growing sectionalism.
Webster-Hayne debate - Wikisource, the free online library . . Rachel Venter is a recent graduate of Metropolitan State University of Denver. He joined Hayne in using this opportunity to try to detach the West from the East, and restore the old cooperation of the West and the South against New England. . Well, let's look at the various parts. All other trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners. The senator from Massachusetts, in denouncing what he is pleased to call the Carolina doctrine,[5] has attempted to throw ridicule upon the idea that a state has any constitutional remedy by the exercise of its sovereign authority against a gross, palpable, and deliberate violation of the Constitution. He called it an idle or a ridiculous notion, or something to that effect; and added, that it would make the Union a mere rope of sand. I would definitely recommend Study.com to my colleagues. Finding our lot cast among a people, whom God had manifestly committed to our care, we did not sit down to speculate on abstract questions of theoretical liberty. . Speech on Assuming Office of the President. The action, the drama, the suspensewho needs the movies? If slavery, as it now exists in this country, be an evil, we of the present day found it ready made to our hands.
Competing Conceptions of Union and Ordered Liberty in The Webster-Hayne Eloquence threw open the portals of eternal day. An error occurred trying to load this video. .
The Webster-Hayne Debate | Hopkins Press There was an end to all apprehension.
Compare And Contrast The Tension Between North And South to expose them to the temptations inseparable from the direction and control of a fund which might be enlarged or diminished almost at pleasure, without imposing burthens upon the people? An accomplished politician, Hayne was an eloquent orator who enthralled his audiences. Let us look at the historical facts. Plus, get practice tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help you Finally, sir, the honorable gentleman says, that the states will only interfere, by their power, to preserve the Constitution. One was through protective tariffs, high taxes on imports and exports. Sir, I have had some opportunities of making comparisons between the condition of the free Negroes of the North and the slaves of the South, and the comparison has left not only an indelible impression of the superior advantages of the latter, but has gone far to reconcile me to slavery itself. In our contemplation, Carolina and Ohio are parts of the same country; states, united under the same general government, having interests, common, associated, intermingled. . Hayne's First Speech (January 19, 1830) Webster's First Reply to Hayne (January 20, 1830) Hayne's Second Speech (January 21, 1830) Webster's Second Reply to Hayne (January 26-27, 1830) This page was last edited on 13 June 2021, at . The Webster-Hayne debate laid out key issues faced by the Senate in the 1820s and 1830s. . Correct answers: 2 question: Which of the following is the best definition of a hypothesis? . . Thirty years before the Civil War broke out, disunion appeared to be on the horizon with the Nullification Crisis. Those who would confine the federal government strictly within the limits prescribed by the Constitutionwho would preserve to the states and the people all powers not expressly delegatedwho would make this a federal and not a national Unionand who, administering the government in a spirit of equal justice, would make it a blessing and not a curse. . I will struggle while I have life, for our altars and our fire sides, and if God gives me strength, I will drive back the invader discomfited.
Andrew Jackson & the Nullification Crisis | The Hermitage Well, it's important to remember that the nation was still young and much different than what we think of today. The great debate, which culminated in Hayne's encounter with Webster, came about in a somewhat casual way. Van Buren responded to the Panic of 1837 with the idea of the independent treasury, which was a. a system of depositing money in select independent banks Nullification, Webster maintained, was a political absurdity. Well, the southern states were infuriated. . The people of the United States cherish a devotion to the Union, so pure, so ardent, that nothing short of intolerable oppression, can ever tempt them to do anything that may possibly endanger it. I know that there are some persons in the part of the country from which the honorable member comes, who habitually speak of the Union in terms of indifference, or even of disparagement. Sir, there does not exist, on the face of the whole earth, a population so poor, so wretched, so vile, so loathsome, so utterly destitute of all the comforts, conveniences, and decencies of life, as the unfortunate blacks of Philadelphia, and New York, and Boston. South Carolinas Declaration of the Causes of Secession (1860), Jefferson Daviss Inaugural Address (1861), Documents in Detail: The Webster-Hayne Debates, Remarks in Congress on the Tariff of Abominations, Check out our collection of primary source readers. It has always been regarded as a matter of domestic policy, left with the states themselves, and with which the federal government had nothing to do.
Webster-Hayne debate - Wikipedia You see, to the south, the Constitution was essentially a treaty signed between sovereign states. Mr. Hayne having rejoined to Mr. Webster, especially on the constitutional question.
Webster-Hayne Debate | Encyclopedia.com 136 lessons The Webster Hayne Debate.
Webster's Reply to Hayne - National Park Service The Webster-Hayne Debates | Teaching American History Sir, we will not stop to inquire whether the black man, as some philosophers have contended, is of an inferior race, nor whether his color and condition are the effects of a curse inflicted for the offences of his ancestors. In January 1830, a debate on the nature of sovereignty in the America. On this subject, as in all others, we ask nothing of our Northern brethren but to let us alone; leave us to the undisturbed management of our domestic concerns, and the direction of our own industry, and we will ask no more. Benton was rising in renown as the advocate not only of Western settlers but of a new theory that the public lands should be given away instead of sold to them.
The Webster-Hayne Debate: Defining Nationhood in the Early American . Union, of itself, is considered by the disciples of this school as hardly a good. When my eyes shall be turned to behold, for the last time, the sun in Heaven, may I not see him shining on the broken and dishonored fragments of a once glorious Union; on states dissevered, discordant, belligerent; on a land rent with civil feuds, or drenched, it may be, in fraternal blood!